Why Fever reporter lost credentials for spreading 'inaccurate information' after reporting on Caitlin Clark
· Yahoo Sports
Why Fever reporter lost credentials for spreading 'inaccurate information' after reporting on Caitlin Clark originally appeared on The Sporting News. Add The Sporting News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
Caitlin Clark's surprise absence during the Fever's May 20 tilt with the Portland Fire had a dire impact on veteran reporter Scott Agness' relationship with Indiana's press relations.
Visit newsbetsport.bond for more information.
Clark was surprisingly ruled inactive for the nationally televised contest despite not being listed on an injury report the day before. Agness, a longtime journalist who has covered the Fever for a decade, reported that Clark's absence was part of a cautionary strategy employed by Indiana to limit the strain on Clark's body after an injury-plagued 2025.
What seemed a fairly benign report appears to have turned sour for Agness, who announced on June 2 that he had his press credentials formally revoked for his reporting around Clark's DNP.
Here's what you need to know.
SN's WNBA HQ: Live WNBA scores | Updated WNBA standings | Full WNBA schedule
What happened to Scott Agness?
Agness, the man behind Fieldhouse Files — one of the more popular basketball publications on Substack — explained that he had his "credentialed access to all team events" revoked in a recent post.
Indiana's public relations cited Agness' tweet about Clark being ruled out 100 minutes before the start of its May 20 contest with the Fire as reason for his ban.
According to Agness, Fever PR claimed that Agness' tweet — which says Clark's absence was "part of a strategic management plan for the season" — was "inaccurate and unsubstantiated."
"In my response, I told the organization that I stand by my reporting and the intent behind it," Agness wrote.
MORE: Sophie Cunningham reveals Fever held 'secret' team meetings
Why did Fever revoke Scott Agness' credentials?
Agness offered context for the factors that may have led to Indiana's decision to banish him from credentialed access in his latest Substack post. His coverage of Clark's absence appears to have sparked the Fever into action.
On May 20, Agness – who has covered Indiana since 2013 — wrote that the Fever were limiting Clark in part due to "a strategic management plan." That wasn't to say that Indiana had a doctrine laid out to keep Clark off the floor at different points of the season, Agness explained. Rather, he viewed the situation as a fluid one, with the Fever taking into account the injury woes Clark suffered during her sophomore campaign to determine which games to include her in.
Agness included Clark's words in his piece, including a May 26 interview with the Indiana supernova discussing her back, which can often be seen cloaked in a black heating pad while on the bench.
"I don’t think it necessarily started at a certain point," Clark said of her back health. "I think it’s just been over the course of the last year when I’ve been understanding my body more.
"I think it’s just finding the balance of when I maybe don’t need to be as aware and when I’m maybe a little too overaware. So still working through that, but I don’t think it’s anything of concern."
MORE: How Caitlin Clark and Raven Johnson put past beef behind them as WNBA teammates
"The Fever took specific issue with the phrase 'strategic management plan.'" Agness wrote on June 2. "That’s their right. However, it is consistent with what the team has been publicly emphasizing since last season — keeping the big picture in mind and taking a cautious approach."
Agness also cited his faltering relationship with the Pacers as a potential factor in the Fever's decision to revoke his credentials. Since the 2023-24 season, Agness has been subjected to less access than expected for a journalist of his experience.
Following NBA All-Star Weekend in Indianapolis in 2024, Agness had no access and was taken off the Pacers' email distribution because he had parked in the media lot "without the appropriate passes or clearance." Agness denies the Pacers' charges vehemently. He also believes it has affected his standing with NBA PR at large. For example, Agness had his credential to cover the 2026 All-Star Game — one which featured Indiana star Pascal Siakam — revoked. He also was ruled ineligible to attend last month's NBA Draft Lottery.
"I cannot definitively say whether those Pacers circumstances influenced the Fever’s decision," Agness wrote. "What I can say is that this latest action follows a pattern that has made it increasingly difficult for an independent journalist to provide the type of on-the-ground coverage that readers deserve."
MORE: Why did Caitlin Clark receive backlash for attending Morgan Wallen concert?
What did Scott Agness say about Caitlin Clark, Fever?
Agness didn't appear to say anything too incendiary regarding Clark. Rather, he reported that Indiana's decision to leave Clark out of its May 20 matchup against Portland was informed by an aversion to over-exert Clark given the injury-plagued notion of her 2025 season. Clark played in just 13 games as a sophomore.
Clark appeared to offer a similar assessment while speaking with reporters prior to the Fever's May 22 game against the Valkyries.
"These are the best players in the world and if I don’t feel a hundred percent confident in my body, like on game five of the year, I don’t know if that’s really worth it in that scenario," Clark said.
"I want to play every single game. I want to play 44 games in a season. I’m doing everything I can to do that. I’m putting my body in my best position I can to — and I feel really good and really confident in my body, but there’s moments where I still struggle a little bit and I get in my head and things like that and I’m sore. That’s just the reality of it."
Nevertheless, Indiana's PR seemed dismayed with Agness' view on the Fever's handling of Clark's health. The Fever have summarily been criticized for their heavy-handed approach to dealing with Agness for a host of sources, including, most notably, the Professional Basketball Writers Associations' WNBA Chapter board. The organization issued the following statement denouncing Indiana's actions:
"The PBWA objects in the strongest possible terms to any reporter losing access for the act of reporting," the statement reads. "Any effort to prevent reporters from doing the work of informing the public reflects poorly on any team and league, which attempts to do so, and runs contrary to the best interests of all involved, most of all the public."